Skip to content

MHAMD Perspectives

Psychiatrist File Suit Against Anthem Well Point for Parity Violations

 

PRESS RELEASE FROM THE AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION

American Psychiatric Association and Others Seek Court’s Intervention in Compelling Anthem and Wellpoint to End Alleged Discrimination Against Mental Health Patients

ARLINGTON, Va. (April 11, 2013) The American Psychiatric Association, the Connecticut Psychiatric Society, the Connecticut Council of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and two individuals have filed suit in the U.S District Court in Connecticut against Anthem Health Plans, Inc. and its parent company,  Wellpoint, Inc., alleging that the companies discriminate against mental health care patients in violation of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA), Connecticut parity law,  and other state laws.  The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief that would declare that Anthem’s conduct since January 1, 2013 is illegal and prohibit the Companies from continuing to discriminate against those with a mental illness.

 MHPAEA prohibits group health plans and health insurance issuers from imposing financial requirements and treatment limitations on mental health and substance use disorder benefits that are not on par with, or equivalent to, requirements or limitations imposed on medical/surgical benefits.  Connecticut’s state mental health parity law requires that all plans offer mental health benefit and prohibits plans from establishing terms or conditions of benefits that place a greater burden on individuals seeking mental health benefits than on individuals seeking medical/surgical benefits.

 According to the suit, Defendants have used recent changes in the CPT codes (Current Procedural Terminology) used by physicians for billing, as an excuse to reduce the fees paid to psychiatrists and to impose upon mental health patients greater burden and expense than it imposes upon patients seeking non-mental health care medical services. Anthem’s  rate manipulation allegedly discriminates against mental health patients because it would result in: (1) effectively precluding psychiatric patients from receiving psychotherapy from a psychiatrist in the same session as the patient is medically evaluated, thereby increasing the time burden and imposing additional copayment obligations on mental health patients; (2) up to a 93% greater financial burden on psychiatric patients who purchase and use out of network benefits; and (3) diminution of in network psychiatrists because the rates being offered to psychiatrists are approximately 20% lower than the rates paid to non-psychiatric physicians for medical evaluation and management services.

 Plaintiffs allege that “this result is not distasteful to Defendants since Defendants’ customers will not access care and Defendants will not have to pay for it.  Indeed, appropriate payment for services, to the extent it increased, is an expense Defendants would have to deduct from their $2.5 plus billion in net revenue” reported in 2012.

 APA President, Dilip Jeste, M.D. commented that, “APA worked hard to ensure passage of MHPAEA so that mental health patients would not be deprived of treatment or stigmatized for seeking it. Anthem, Wellpoint companies and others throughout the U.S. need to start respecting the law and our members’ patients and not directly or indirectly inhibit access to the treatment for which the patients and their employers have paid.” 

 “Mental health parity was passed long ago at the federal level and in the state of Connecticut,” said Carolyn Drazinic, M.D., Ph.D., President-elect, Connecticut Psychiatric Society. “Insurance companies have had plenty of time to comply. The time has come to enforce the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. All patients should receive the same benefits for mental health services as for medical services, without discrimination.”

Brian Keyes, M.D., President, Connecticut Council of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, added that, “Equal coverage for treatment of mental health problems in children and their families is legally required federally and within Connecticut.  The failure of insurance companies to cover the same range of treatments of mental illness as they would for physical illness is both illegal and unethical.  True mental health parity must be enforced.”

Related News

Class Action Suit Filed Against United Healthcare Alleging Parity Violation

Tags: All Categories, Uncategorized

Pomerantz Law Firm Has Filed a Class Action Against UnitedHealth Group, Inc. for Violations of Federal and State Mental Health Parity Laws – UNH March 12, 2013 15:20 | Source: Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP NEW YORK, March 12, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP has filed a …

Read more

Maryland Parity Project and Other Parity Advocates Push for Passage of Parity Enforcement Legislation

Tags: All Categories, Uncategorized

The battle to obtain behavioral health services has long since been raging in the United States. Historically, the stigma surrounding mental illness and addiction has barred many from accessing treatment and has been reinforced by insurance carriers offering less coverage for behavioral health than somatic health. The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity …

Read more

Class Action Lawsuit Filed in California Alleging Violation of State Parity Law

Tags: All Categories, Uncategorized

Press Release of the Los Angeles Law Firm of Cohen Mckeon, May 21, 2012 A class-action lawsuit was filed against United Healthcare Insurance Company, US Behavioral Plan, and California United Behavioral Health, which contracts with employers such as the University of California to provide mental health services to policyholders. The class-action suit alleges that these companies, …

Read more

Help MHAMD Now.

Every Donation Makes a Difference.

Your gift will help us protect mental health and ensure equitable access to care for all Marylanders.