Skip to content

MHAMD Perspectives

Reactions to Final Parity Ruling

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”,”serif”;}

On November 8th, 2013, the parity implementation ruling was finally released to address behavioral health discrimination. The long awaited ruling has garnered reactions among lawmakers, behavioral health advocates, agencies, and insurance carriers.

The Obama Administration

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, confidently announced, “we are finally closing those gaps.” Although receiving backlash about the shortcomings of the HealthCare.gov website, the administration is able to partially check off another executive action on its list. And the Office of the Vice President, remarked “Parity is not just a buzzword. It has real impact for the millions of people who are experiencing or will experience mental illness or addiction.”

Congressional Statements

Several US Senators and Representatives have released statements on the final parity ruling. Below are just a few press releases:

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”,”serif”;}

Sen. Stabenow (D-MI)

Sen. Blumenthal (D-CT)

Minority Leader Pelosi (D-CA)

Rep. Murphy (R-PA)

Rep. Ryan (D-OH)

Rep Deutch (D-FL)

Joint release from Reps Napolitano (D-CA), Ryan (D-OH), Barber (D-AZ), Tonko (D-NY) and Lee (D-CA)

 

Mental Health Advocates

As the dust begins to settle after individuals were given access to the lengthy document, advocates pointed out that while the rule closes some gaps, there are still issues remaining. The final ruling clarified a number of gray areas from the interim rules in 2010, but does not apply to Medicaid managed care plans, upcoming guidance is still expected on this issue. Though the rules were not perfect, they were a huge step in the right direction. Debbie Plotnick, senior director of state policy for Mental Health America, announced on Friday, November 8th, “what a historic day this is, and what a difference it will make to families and individuals who have been discriminated against legally  for many, many years.”

Patrick Kennedy expressed conflicted views as well since implementation plans were finally written down, but sadly, it took 5 years. In a recent remark, Kennedy alluded the most important part is whether the regulations will be monitored and enforced. The true test will present itself once a consumer of mental health services enters the appeals process.

Enforcement Agencies

Officials at three agencies – the U.S. Treasury’s Internal Revenue Services; the U.S. Labor Department’s Employee Benefits Security Administration; and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight- are working collectively to assist insurers and employers to comply with the parity rules. Each agency will collaborate with state regulators and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners to ensure compliance and to answer questions.

Insurance Companies & Parity Regulations

Some advocates assumed the release Final Rule would be met with resistance from the insurance carriers since they cannot charge more for co-pays, charge mental health consumers separate deductibles, nor restrict visits more than medical/surgical care. Dr. Peter Beilenson (founder of insurance co-op Evergreen Health Cooperative Inc.) instead applauds the decision since people with mental health problems are often underserved. Beilenson further explained, most visits to primary care physicians are because of mental health conditions, such as depression. These individuals should see mental health professionals.

 

Related News

Final Parity Rule Upholds Strong Consumer Protections

Tags: All Categories, Uncategorized

After a 3 year wait, the Final Regulations for the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act were released on November 13, 2013 and will take effect on January 13, 2013 for plans with effective dates on or after July 1, 2014. All 206 pages of the Rule can be found in the Federal Register and …

Read more

Representatives Kennedy and Ramstad Commit to Fight for Final Rule on Mental Health Parity

Tags: All Categories, Uncategorized

Parity Champions Representatives Kennedy and Ramstad persist in the parity battle. Both were sponsors of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and were instrumental in its passage. At a lunch on March 14th at the National Press Club, Kennedy and Ramstad pledged their commitment to stay involved in the fight for final regulations …

Read more

Maryland Parity Project and Other Parity Advocates Push for Passage of Parity Enforcement Legislation

Tags: All Categories, Uncategorized

The battle to obtain behavioral health services has long since been raging in the United States. Historically, the stigma surrounding mental illness and addiction has barred many from accessing treatment and has been reinforced by insurance carriers offering less coverage for behavioral health than somatic health. The Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity …

Read more

Help MHAMD Now.

Every Donation Makes a Difference.

Your gift will help us protect mental health and ensure equitable access to care for all Marylanders.